Posts

OFFENCE AGAINST WOMEN BIGAMY

LAWXPERTSMV   # NOTES FOR UPSC LAW OPTIONAL MAINS OFFENCE AGAINST WOMEN – BIGAMY SECTION 394 IPC The following are the main offenses committed against women. Section 354 to 373 was already discussed. The rest are discussed herewith: 1) Bigamy [Sec. 394 of the I.P.C.]- Watch Out! having two living spouse at same time is an offence. 2) Cohabitation by deceitful means by making a woman believe that she is lawfully wedded to him. [Sec. 493 of the I.P.C.] Beware ! Touch a girl only when you really intend to wedlock her. 3) Marriage ceremony fraudulently gone through without lawful marriage[ Sec. 496 of the I.P.C. ATTENTION! Mock marriages not only a sin but also an offence ( @ offenders don’t wait for hell / you will be punished on earth ). 4) Adultery [Sec. 497 of the I.P.C.] See it right ! never overlook your wedlock, IPC cautions you- Recently held to be unconstitutional #Joseph Shine vs. Union of India 5) Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman [ Sec. 498 of the I.P.C.] Warning ! if you steal others wife, IPC will steal your life and personal liberty from you. 6) Cruelty by husband or relative of husband [ Sec. 498-A of the I.P.C.’] STAY CAUTIONED !  you make your daughter in law unhappy then IPC makes the whole family unhappy. 7) Insulting the modesty of a woman by any word gesture of act [Sec. 509 of the I.P.C.] MIND YOU ! you are in this world because of a women dare to insult her modesty. BIGAMY BIGAMY simply means the offence of marrying someone while already married to another person. SECTION 394: Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife: Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine SECTION 394 has 3 major components : COMPONENT 1: DEFINE BIGAMY as follows: A person commits bigamy when he/she: – When  husband or wife living, – marries another person #  Lingari Obulamma vs L. Venkata Reddy . COMPONENT 2: RESULT OF BIGAMOUS MARRIAGE: BIGAMOUS MARRIAGE = VOID , – by reason of its taking place during the life of husband or wife. TO ENQUIRE ABOUT COURSES CONTACT US -  New batch starts on 16th September 2020 and 2021 – UPSC LAW OPTIONAL MAINS COURSES Call / Whats app -6382125862 Website – www.lawxpertsmv.com E-mail – lawxpertsmv@gmail.com COMPONENT 3: PUNISHMENT FOR COMMITTING BIGAMY: PUNISHMENT : imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine EXCEPTION- (1) When the previous marriage has been declared void by a competent court # Gopal Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan . TO ATTRACT BIGAMY BOTH MARRIAGES MUST BE VAILD VALIDITY OF MARRIAGE ? MARRIAGE MUST FULLFIL PERSONAL LAW REQUIREMENTS/ CEREMONIES (2) When the husband or wife has been continually absent or not heard of for seven years, provided that the fact is disclosed to the person with whom the second marriage is contracted. (3) When the first marriage was dissolved by a decree of divorce by a court having the competent jurisdiction. (4) Mohammedan males do not come within the purview of this section since a Mohammedan male may have four wives at a time according to his personal law. BIGAMY BY CONCEALING PRIOR MARRIAGE:Section 495 Indian Penal Code states that, “Same offence with concealment of former marriage from person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted- Whoever commits the offence defined in the last preceding section having concealed from the person with whom the subsequent marriage is contracted, the fact of the former marriage, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall be liable to fine”. LEGAL PARADOX: These sections apply to Mohammedan women but not to Mohammedan men, while they apply equally to men and women amongst Hindus, Christians and Parsis # See Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 WHETHER OTHER RELIGION MALES CAN CONVERT TO ISLAM JUST TO REMARRY ? This was answered by SC in famous Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani v Union of India, AIR 1995 SC 1531 : Mere conversion does not automatically dissolve the first marriage, and thereby doe not absolve the person from criminal liability for committing the offence of bigamy. One cannot covert for purpose of remarrying. WHO CAN MAKE A COMPLAINT? ONLY FIRST WIFE ? Nope, even the second wife can make the complaint of offence of bigamy # Subash Babu Vs. State of A.P. & ANR. On 21 July, 2011 TO ENQUIRE ABOUT COURSES CONTACT US -  New batch starts on 18th September 2020 and 2021 – UPSC LAW OPTIONAL MAINS COURSES Call / Whats app -6382125862 Website – www.lawxpertsmv.com E-mail – lawxpertsmv@gmail.com FOR LATEST UPSC LAW OPTIONAL MAINS COURSES CLICK BELOW  CLICK HERE : 2021 COMPREHENSIVE COURSE : https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/2021-law-optional-course CLICK HERE :2020 COMPREHENSIVE COURSE : https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/lawoptional2018 CLICK HERE : 2020 TEST SERIES : https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/25-tests-2020-law-optional-testseri

JUDICIAL SERVICE NOTES

Judicial Service Examination notes | Judgments - section 353 to 356 Cr.P.C

                                                                                   Chapter XXII- JUDGMENTS                                                                                     SECTION- 353- 365 CRPC Synopsis: 1) Meaning of Judgment 2) Contents of Judgment [Section 354, 355] 3) Special components of Judgment [Section 356- 359, 357A] 4) Pronouncement of judgment [Section 353] 5) Proceedings after the judgment [Section 362- 365] What is judgment ? The Judgment as a concept has not been defined in the Code of Criminal Procedure. Therefore getting help of case law : Judgment means the expression of the opinion of judge or magistrate arrived after due consideration of evidence and of the arguments # Damu Senapathi v. Sridhar Rajwar Features to be noted : a) It terminates the judicial proceedings or put an end to those proceedings after consideration of evidence on record by both parties and arguments of the concerned parties. b) It is final or definitive in nature unless appeal is preferred in that case. Contents of Judgment: Section 354 provides the following contents of Judgment- Before content what should be the language of the judgment ? Language of the judgment | Judgment shall be in the language of court and can be translated if required as per Section 364 CrPC. Section 364 CrPC provides that when judgment is recorded in a language different from language of the court, then it must be translated into the language of the court if accused requires so. What is language of court then ? Section 272 deals with language of the court. It provides that the State government may determine what shall be, for purposes of this Code, the language of each Court within the State other than the High Court. Language of record of evidence is provided under Section 277 CrPC. It provides that if witness gives any evidence in the language of the court, it must be taken down in that language. CONTENTS OF JUDGMENT – Section 354 and Section 355 COMPONENT 1 : It shall contain: · Points to be determined in that case · Findings on both the points, or decision on both points as per evidence on record. · Reasons given by the court for these findings or decisions. If the appellate court agree with findings of the lower court reasons need not be repeated On conviction !  The judgment shall specify the offence by mentioning Section of IPC or any other law for the time being in force for which accused is convicted and sentenced. On Acquittal ! If judgment is of acquittal, the offence for which accused is acquitted shall be mentioned and direction be given that he be set free at liberty. COMPONENT 3 : REASON FOR PUNISHMENT WHEN DEATH PENALTY AWARDED : In cases where offence is punishable with death or alternative with life imprisonment or any other imprisonment, the court shall record the reasons for that and in case of death sentence, special reasons are to be given making it rarest of rare case as per Supreme Court Judgment. WHEN LESSER PUNISHMENT GIVEN THAN PRESCRIBED BY LAW : When imprisonment for offence punishable with one year or more is there and accused is given imprisonment of less than 3 months in that case, court has to record reasons for that except in cases of summary trial or imprisonment till the rising of the court. a) In case of death sentence, court will pass an order to hang him by neck till he is dead. b) When court is to pass an order under Section 117, 138, 125, 145, 147, the court must mention the points to be determined for disposal of case and reasons for the final decision after determination of points involved in each case. POINT TO BE NOTED | The decision of trial court sentencing the accused with death penalty is not final unless it is confirmed by the High Court under Section 368 of CrPC. Court need to state special reasons also while passing such sentence and shall award death penalty in rarest of rare cases. When and how special reasons should be recorded ? RELEVANT CASE LAW | Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 684 In this case, the Supreme Court observed: “As we read Sections 354(3) and 235(2) and other related provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, it is quite clear to us that for making the choice of punishment or for ascertaining the  existence or absence of ‘special reasons’ in that context, the court must pay due regard both to the crime and the criminal. What is the relative weight to be given to the aggravating and mitigating factors, depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. More often than not, these two aspects are so intertwined that it is difficult to give a separate treatment to each of them. This is so because ‘style is the man’. In many cases, the extremely cruel or beastly manner of the commission of murder is itself a demonstrated index of the depraved character of the perpetrator. That is why, it is not desirable to consider the circumstances of the crime and circumstances of the criminal in two separate watertight compartments. In a sense, to kill is to be cruel and therefore all murders are cruel. But such cruelty may vary in its degree of culpability. And it is only when the culpability assumes the proportion of extreme depravity that ‘special reasons’ can legitimately be said to exist. Kumar v. Inspector of Police (2015) 2 SCC 346  If death sentence is awarded, special reasons shall be recorded by the court and also consider special circumstances under which death penalty is imposed. Judgment in abridged form: Section 355 Metropolitan magistrate is required to record the following particulars at the time of passing a judgment: a) Serial number of the case. b) Date on which offence has been committed. c) Complainant’s name. d) Name of accused and his parents and residence. e) What offence is complained of or proved. f) Plea of accused and his examination. g) Final order passed h) Date on which that order is passed. i) Cases in which appeal lies from final order under Section 373 or under Section 374(3), along with brief statement of the reasons of such decision. Special Components of judgments Order to notify address | Section 356 On whom it applies ?  Accused who has been previously convicted by any court other than Magistrate of 2nd class of 1. Offence punishable U/s 215, 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D, 506 2. Any offence under chapter XII or Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII – imprisonment for 3 years or upward Then the court – While convicting can order to notify any change or absence from residence after the release Rationale | Provision of section 356 is enacted for keeping an eye on the activities of persons who are indulged in different criminal activities, i.e. habitual offenders such as thief, thug, one who counterfeits coins and currency notes, one who cheats etc. Follow up | Section 356 provides that information and all details about such person must be notified to the court for a period of five years from the date of his release. Effect of acquittal | If conviction in such case is set-aside later on appeal etc, then order passed under this section will become void. Scope of section: 356 · An order under this section can also be made by an appellate court, or by High Court or Court of Session when it exercises its power of revision. · The section applies not only to the offences mentioned above but also to abatement, attempt and conspiracy of offences mentioned above. · Other to notify address is not mandatory – only if the court thinks necessary it could order for the same. ORDER TO PAY COMPENSATION | SECTION 357 Introduction : As per section 357, order to pay compensation under Clause 1 and clause 3 to victim of the offence has to be made as per amendment of 2009. Compensation under this section is awarded irrespective of the fact that offence is one which is punishable with fine and that fine is actually imposed in the case but compensation in that will be ordered only if conviction is passed against the offender. Power given to Court U/s 375 | Court can  order the whole or even part of the fine to apply 1. for prosecution expenses 2. compensation to any person who suffered loss or injury on account of offence committed – provided the compensation is recoverable from civil court 3. When accused is convicted for causing death or abetted such death compensation could be ordered to be paid to the person entitled for benefit as under Fatal Accidents Act 4. Compensation to pay the purchaser when accused convicted for theft, criminal misappropriation, criminal breach of trust, or cheating, or of having dishonestly received or retained, or of having voluntarily assisted in disposing of, stolen property knowing or having reason to believe the same to be stolen. When such order for compensation could be made ? It can be done by Court when it  imposes a sentence of fine or a sentence - including a sentence of death of which fine forms a part. Wide power of court | Court can order payment of compensation even if fine is not the part of punishment Condition | Fine need not be paid till expiry of appeal period and if appeal made then till its judgment is passed fine need not be paid Scope | Power U/s 357 can be  enjoyed by Appellate Court or by the High Court or Court of Session when exercising its powers of revision. Inter- link with civil suit | When a subsequent civil suit to recover compensation on same issue is successful then the money paid under this section must be taken into account. OTHER SECTIONS ON COMPENSATION | Section 357 A provides that state shall prepare for compensation to victims. Victim Compensation Scheme: Section 357A This section has been inserted in 2009 by amendment and came into effect from 31 december, 2009. Victim compensation schemes are to be prepared by State government in coordination with Central government. What does this scheme do ? These schemes, provides for funds which are awarded as compensation to victims of offences or his dependants, who require rehabilitation. Who is a victim ? ‘victim’ is defined under Section 2(wa) as- A person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged and the expression ‘victim’ includes his or her guardian or legal heir # this definition has been in the Criminal Procedure Code in 2009 by way of amendment, with effect from 31 december, 2009. How it works ? Clause 1 : State government in co-ordination with Central government prepare “victim compensation scheme” Purpose of the Scheme : It is formed to provide funds for compensation to victim Who are beneficiaries of this scheme ? Victim or dependents of victim Condition 1: They must have suffered loss/ injury from such offence Condition 2 : They must require rehabilitation Above both conditions must be satisfied How the process starts ? By recommendation | Clause 2 : On recommendation of court – compensation amount will be decided by District Legal Service authority of State legal Service authority By application | Clause 4 : If offender is not known or identified but victim is known and trial does not take place, then an application may be made to State or District Legal Services Authority for award of compensation. When court can recommend ? Clause 3 : If trial court feels compensation U/s 357 is not adequate or accused acquitted / discharged but victim needs rehabilitation then it can make such recommendation. What happens next ? On recommendation of court or by application of victim under clause (4 ) District or State legal service authority will made enquiry then award compensation based on it. Power to provide immediate relief | The concerned legal service authority can award initial immediate payment for first –aid or medical benefits or other appropriate relief for free of cost under clause (6) BUT ! A certificate must be obtained on this regard from any officer not below rank of Officer in charge of police station or magistrate. How it works ? Clause 1 : State government in co-ordination with Central government prepare “victim compensation scheme” Purpose of the Scheme : It is formed to provide funds for compensation to victim Who are beneficiaries of this scheme ? Victim or dependents of victim Condition 1: They must have suffered loss/ injury from such offence Condition 2 : They must require rehabilitation Above both conditions must be satisfied How the process starts ? By recommendation | Clause 2 : On recommendation of court – compensation amount will be decided by District Legal Service authority of State legal Service authority By application | Clause 4 : If offender is not known or identified but victim is known and trial does not take place, then an application may be made to State or District Legal Services Authority for award of compensation. When court can recommend ? Clause 3 : If trial court feels compensation U/s 357 is not adequate or accused acquitted / discharged but victim needs rehabilitation then it can make such recommendation. What happens next ? On recommendation of court or by application of victim under clause (4 ) District or State legal service authority will made enquiry then award compensation based on it. Power to provide immediate relief | The concerned legal service authority can award initial immediate payment for first –aid or medical benefits or other appropriate relief for free of cost under clause (6) BUT ! A certificate must be obtained on this regard from any officer not below rank of Officer in charge of police station or magistrate. Section 357B and 357 C has been added in 2013 by Criminal law (Amendment) Act, 2013 with effect from 3 February, 2013. · Section 357B provides that the compensation to be paid under Section 357A is awarded in addition to fine imposed on accused under Section 326A or 376D i.e. in case of Acid attacks or in case of gang rape, this fine is also paid to victim. · Section 357 C deals with treatment of victims of offences under Section 326A, 376, 376 (A-E) of Indian Penal Code. Any hospital – private or public run by state government, central government or local body must provide first aid immediately ( mandatory ) and inform police immediately. · Section 358 provides that compensation to groundlessly arrested persons in cases where person is arrested without sufficient reasons earlier to this section, there are many cases where Supreme Court has awarded compensation to persons groundlessly arrested. Note : In such cases, the magistrate may award compensation not exceeding rupees 1000. If there are more offenders than one, then magistrate shall award each to pay amount upto Rs. 1000. The compensation under this section shall be recovered as if it were fine and if no amount is paid then person would be imprisoned with simple imprisonment of up to thirty days. · Section 359 lays down the provision for payment of cost of litigation in non-cognizable cases to complainant where accused is convicted of the offence. · Section 360 provides for probation of offender. If conditions of probation are fulfilled, probation will be granted to the offender as per rules of Probation of Offenders Act. Following factors are considered in order to release a person on probation: i. If he is not below 21 years of age and is convicted for offence which is punished with fine only ii. If person is not below 21 years of age and is punished with imprisoned upto seven years or for less than 7 years iii. or person is below 21 years of age, iv. any woman is convicted for an offence punishable other than with death sentence or imprisonment for life. v. No previous conviction has been proved against the accused. Under Section 361 CrPC special reasons must be recorded in the judgment when court deals with following cases- i. An accused person under Section 360, or under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, or ii. A youthful offender under the Children Act, 1960, or any other law for the time being in force for the treatment, training or rehabilitation of youthful offenders. PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT : SECTION 353 What section says ? a) The criminal court of original jurisdiction shall pronounce the judgment. b) It shall be pronounced in open court. c) The presiding officer of the court shall pronounce the judgment. d) The judgment shall be pronounced immediately after determination of trial or within some subsequent time of which notice shall be given to the party or its pleader. Manner of delivery of judgment v By delivery of judgment, it means whole of the judgment. In that case, Presiding officer shall cause it to be taken in short hand and sign the transcript and every page thereof as soon as made ready, write on it date of delivery of judgment in the open court. The Presiding officer may pronounce the judgment by reading whole of the judgment or by reading only the operative part of the judgment in the language understood by accused or his pleader. In both cases, it must be dated and signed by presiding officer in open court and if the judgment is not in written form, then in his hand writing he must sign every page of the judgment. Copy of judgment must be made available to the parties or his pleader. If accused is in custody, then he shall be brought to hear the judgment and its pronouncement. If accused is not in custody, then he shall be required by the court to attend the hearing when judgment is to be pronounced, except in cases where personal experience of the accused is dispensed with and sentence is fine only or acquittal order. When there are more than one accused, if one or more than one is not present on date of judgment, the presiding officer may pronounce judgment in the absence of accused, the reason behind it is to prevent unnecessary delay. The judgment pronounced by criminal court is not considered invalid by reason of absence of party or pleader or any omission to serve the notice of any person.The provisions of this section would not affect Section 465 CrPC unless it results in failure of justice. Case law | Ajay Singh and others v. State of Chattisgarh, Criminal appeal nos. 32-33 of 2017 In this case, Supreme Court held that Judge need to be diligent- a) Although term ‘judgment’ is not defined but provisions for pronouncement of judgment are laid under Chapter XXVII of the Code. It provides that judgment must be pronounced in open court y delivering whole of the judgment or by reading operative part of the judgment. The substance of the judgment shall be explained to accused or his pleader in the language which he understands. b) Judge must be diligent while dealing with the case so that no dent remains in the trial or injustice does not occur. PROVISIONS AFTER JUDGMENT IS PRONOUNCED As per section 362- once judgment is pronounced, no alteration in that can be made except relating to clerical or arithmetic error. Section 363- i. Where accused is sentenced to imprisonment, copy of judgment has to be given immediately after pronouncement of judgment, free of cost. ii. On application of accused, certified copy must be given without delay, free of cost, where it’s an appealable case. However, where death sentence is awarded, copy of judgment must be given immediately whether accused has applied for it or not. Where judgment is not in the language of court, then if accused so desires, judgment be translated in language of court and copy of that be made available as part of record. Section 365: District Magistrate is to be informed by copy of findings and sentence within whose jurisdiction trial was held. FOR LATEST JUDICIAL SERVICE COURSES CLICK :  https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/ju...

Offer The Basis Of Contracts - Notes for UPSC Law Optional Mains

LAWXPERTSMV  | OFFER – Basis of Law of Contracts                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             #Notes that comes handy – Introduction notes OFFER : An offer is the first step in the formation of a contract. An offer is a proposal by one person to another to enter into a contract. RELEVANT SECTION : 2(a) BARE TEXT | ‘When one person signifies to another, his willingness to do or abstain from doing anything with a view to obtaining the assent of the other, to such an act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal’. CONCEPT | offer = a proposal made by one person to another to do an act or abstain from doing it. The person who makes the offer is known as the promisor or offer or and The person to whom an offer is made is known as the promisee or the offeree. UNILATERAL ACT AS OFFER | Only one person activity is involved EXAMPLE | If X gifts Y his horse, it is an offer of unilateral acts as Y has to do nothing or pay nothing to X in return of the gifts of X. BILATERAL ACT AS OFFER | But in case of offers of bilateral acts or requiring actions by two or more persons, then the offeree is supposed to act or respond in a specified manner. EXAMPLE | Now suppose X offers to sell his horse for Rs. 1000 to Y then here Y also is expected to pay Rs. 1000 to X. NOTE : It is only the second type of offers about which we are concerned in the Indian Contract Act. Thus an offer can be analysed into two parts comprising of :- a promise by the offeror + willingness and a request to the offeree for something in return of the offer or seeking acceptance for such willingness. TO ENQUIRE ABOUT COURSES CONTACT US -  New batch starts soon 2020 and 2021 – UPSC LAW OPTIONAL MAINS COURSES Call / Whats app -6382125862 Website – www.lawxpertsmv.com E-mail – lawxpertsmv@gmail.com DETERMINATION OF AN OFFER (TEST OF AN OFFER) Every proposal made by an offeror is not legally regarded as an offer. Three tests are applied to determine whether or not an offer has actually been made: 1. Does the offer show a clear intention on the part of the offeror to be bound by it. 2. Whether the proposal is definite? 3. Whether the offer is communicated to the offeror? CHARACTERISTIC OF OFFER CHARACTER 1 | OFFER MUST BE CERTAIN The offer must have its terms definite and clear | The terms of the offer must be certain, definite and clear. If the terms of the offer are not certain or definite, it is not a valid offer, as it is not clear as to what exactly the parties intend to do. ILLUSTRATION I- Ram offers to sell to Rahim his gold ring for 1, 00,000 or 1, 50,000. Here Ram’s offer is not certain because it is not clear as to which of the prices is to be paid by Rahim. ILLUSTRATION II-  Amar who only deals in coconut oil offers to sell to Akbar (a regular customer) 100 tons of oil. Here, the offer cannot be said uncertain on the grounds that it is not clear what price is to be paid for the oil because if such an offer is accepted by Akbar, Akbar has to pay reasonable price or according to the custom of usage of trade. CURE FOR UNCERTAIN OFFER: According to Sec. 29, if the terms of the offer are capable of being made certain, the offer is not regarded as vague. CHARACTER 2 | THE OFFER MUST BE CAPABLE OF CREATING A LEGAL RELATIONSHIP If the offer does not intend to give rise to legal relationship when accepted it is not a valid offer in the eyes of law | The offer must be such that when accepted it will result in a valid contract. A mere social invitation cannot be regarded as an offer because if such an invitation is accepted, will not result in a valid contract. It is generally contemplated in commercial dealings that the party making a offer is intending to create a legal relationship. ILLUSTRATION-  Amar invited Akbar to a dinner. Akbar accepted the invitation. DISCUSSION | This is a social agreement. If Amar fails to serve dinner to Akbar, Akbar cannot go to the court of law for enforcing the agreement. Similarly, if Akbar fails to attend the dinner, Amar cannot go to the court of law for enforcing the agreement. CHARACTER 3 | THE OFFER MUST BE COMMUNICATED TO THE OTHER PARTY The offer is completed only when it has been communicated to the offeree|  Until the offer is communicated it cannot be accepted. Thus, an offer accepted without its knowledge, does not confer any legal rights on the acceptor # Lalman Shukla vs Gauri Datt. Leading case: Lalman Shukla V. Gauri Dut (1913): In this case, G’s nephew has absconded. He sent L in search of the missing boy. In his absence, G issued hand bills offering a reward of Rs, 501/- to anyone who might find out the boy L found out the boy before seeing the hand bills. Later on, he came to know of the reward and sued G for the reward. Here he could not claim the reward as he did not know about the offer. CHARACTER 4 | MERE STATEMENT OF PRICE NOT OFFER  If a party makes a statement of price, it cannot be taken as an offer to sell at that price. CASE LAW | Harvey and Facey, is important to note in this connection. A asks B, “Will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price ? B replies telegraphically “lowest price for Bumper Hall Pen £ 900”. A responds by telegram “We agree to buy Bumper Ball Pen for the sum of £ 900 asked by you”.  It was held that no contract was concluded between A&B.; Because In first telegraph  A has asked two questions first as to willingness to sell and second as to lowest price. The defendant answered only the second and gave only the lowest price. They reserved their answer as to willingness – thus they had made no offer. Only the last telegram of the plaintiff was an offer to buy but was never accepted by the defendant. PREVIOUS YEAR UPSC QUESTION | YEAR 1994| MARKS 20 | QUESTION 5 b Explain an offer and quotation and differentiate between two. Answer line | Define offer – section 2 (a) – signifying willingness to do something/ abstain from doing something + with an intention to get acceptance from other. Quotation – formal statement of estimated cost. Difference between : Definition Offer step 1 of contract | quotation no contract arise Offer has willingness | quotation no willingness mere price given Offer made to get acceptance | quotation no intention to get acceptance Case laws / example CHARACTER 5 | OFFER MAY BE GENERAL OR SPECIFIC An offer may be made to definite person or persons or to the world at large |  MEANING When it is made to some specific person or persons it is called a specific offer. When it is made to the world at large it is called a General offer. WHO CAN ACCEPT IT ? A specific offer can be accepted only by the person to whom the offer has been made and in the manner, if any specified in the terms of the offer. But a general offer can be accepted by any persons having notice of the offer by doing what is required under the offer. EXAMPLE | The most obvious example of such an offer is where a reward is publicity offered to any about that object, who will recover a lost object or will give some information, there the party claiming the reward has not to prove anything more than that he has performed the conditions on which the reward was offered. EXAMPLE | The time table of railways is a general proposal to run trains according to the table, which is accepted by an intending passenger tendering the price of the ticket. LAND MARK CASE LAW | Carlill V. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1983).  FACTS | In this case, the Company advertised that a reward of £ 100 would be given to any person who contracted influenza after having used the smoke-balls of the Company as directed. Mrs. Carlill used the smoke-balls according to the directions of the company. But contracted influenza. HELD | It was held, that the offer was a general one, and Mrs. Carlill had accepted it by acting in accordance with the advertisement, and therefore, the company could not get away from its responsibility by saying that they had not meant it seriously. She was entitled to the reward. INDIAN CASE LAW | In India, the principle was applied in the case of Har Bhajan. Lal V, Han Charan Lal. In this case offer of reward was made to any one tracing a lost boy and bringing him home. Harbhajan Lal - who knew of the reward. Found out the boy and took him to the Police Station. It was held that he was entitled to the reward. PREVIOUS YEAR UPSC QUESTION | YEAR 2009 | QUESTION 8 B| MARKS 20 Distinguish between the following citing relevant provisions and case law- Specific and general offer Answer line : Difference given above + cases and example CHARACTER 6 | OFFER MAY BE EXPRESS OR IMPLIED EXPRESS OFFER | An offer made by words, spoken or written is termed as an ‘express offer’. Lx Explains: If A says to B that he is willing to sell him his car for a sum of Rs. 10,000 it is an express offer. IMPLIED OFFER | ‘Implied offer’ means an offer made by conduct, an offer may also be implied from the conduct of the parties or the circumstances of the case. This is known as an implied offer. HOW IT WORKS ? When one person allows the other to perform certain acts under such circumstances that nobody would accept them without consideration it will amount to an offer by conduct and the permission of the party, who is benefited by such performances, will amount to his acceptance. Lx Explains: A bus company runs a bus on a particular route. This is an implied offer by the bus company to take any person on the route who is prepared to pay the prescribed fare. The acceptance of the offer is complete as soon as a passenger gets into the bus. CHARACTER 7 | AN OFFER MUST BE DISTINGUISHED FROM INVITATION TO OFFER CONCEPT | An invitation to offer is an action inviting other parties to make an offer to form a contract. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENS ? In the case of an invitation to offer the person sending out the invitation does not make an offer but only invites the other party to make an offer. WHAT IT IS ACTUALLY ? It is a prelude to an offer inviting negotiations or preliminary discussions. THUS | Such invitations for offers are therefore not offers in the eyes of law and do not become agreements by their acceptance. EXAMPLE |  Goods displayed in the shop with the price marked on them, an advertisement for sale of goods by auction, catalogue of prices are all examples of invitations to offer. CASE LAW |  Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 - the display of a flick knife for sale in a shop did not contravene legislation which prohibited "offering for sale an offensive weapon". If a shop mistakenly displays an item for sale at a very low price it is not obliged to sell it for that amount. INVITATION TO OFFER OFFER The person sending out the invitation does not make an offer but only invites the other party to make an offer When one party (the offeror) makes a definite proposal to another party (the offeree) It expresses initial intention It expresses final willingness Example: Issue of prospectus by the company inviting applications Example: Application filled in by prospective applicants to the Company CHARACTER 8 | OFFER NUST BE MADE WITH A VIEW TO OBTAIN THE CONSENT:  The offer must be made with a view to obtain the consent of the other party and not merely with a view to disclosing the intention of making an offer. A proposer cannot also dictate terms under which the offer can be refused. At best, he can lay down the mode of acceptance. CHARACTER 9 | OFFER  SHOULD  NOT  CONTAIN  A  TERM  THAT  NONCOMPLIANCE  OF  WHICH  WOULD  AMOUNT  TO ACCEPTANCE The offer should not contain a term the non-compliance of which would amount to  acceptance. EXAMPLE | A person cannot make such an offer that if the acceptance of the offer is not received up to Monday, the offer would be presumed to have been accepted. CHARACTER 10 | SPECIAL CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO AN OFFER MUST ALSO BE COMMUNICATED Though an offeror is free to lay down any terms and conditions in his offer, but it is the responsibility of the offeror to bring all the terms of the offer to the notice of the other party. The acceptor is bound only for those conditions which have expressly communicated to him or have so clearly been written that he ought to have known them or have reasonable notice of the existence of those terms.  NOTE : He will also be bound by the conditions if he knew of their existence, though they are in a language unknown to him. It is his duty to get them explained. CASE LAW | Henderson V. Stevenson (1875). FACTS | A passenger had purchased a ticket for a journey. On the back of the ticket, there were certain terms and conditions. One of the terms was that the carrying company was not liable for losses of any kind. But there was nothing on the face of the ticket to draw the attention of the passenger to the terms and conditions on the back of ticket. HELD : The passenger was not bound by the terms and conditions on the back side of the ticket. CASE LAW | Thompson V. L. M. & S. Rly. (1930) FACTS |  T, an illiterate, purchased a railway ticket on the front of which was printed “for conditions seek back”. One of the conditions was that the railway company would not be liable for personal injuries to the passenger. An accident caused some injuries to T. HELD | Suit for damages brought by T was dismised as he was bound by the conditions printed on the reverse of the ticket CONCLUSION | Now it is the established law that wherever on the face of a ticket words to the effect “for conditions see back” are printed, the passenger concerned is bound by the conditions, it is immaterial whether he actually reads them or not. If conditions are printed on the back of the ticket, but there is nothing on the face of it to draw attention of the person to these conditions, he is not bound by the conditions. Thus, it is to be noted that a person, who accepted without objection a document containing terms of the offer, which he knows or ought to have known, will be bound by those terms even if he had not read them. However, this rule will not be applicable if the conditions are so irrelevant for unreasonable that an assent to them cannot reasonably be presumed. Similarly, where a condition to an offer is against public policy, it will not be enforced merely because it has been accepted by the acceptor. TENDER A person may invite tenders for the supply of specific goods or services. Thus, a tender, in response to an invitation, is an offer. A tender may be either: (i)    A definite or single offer, or (ii)  A standing or an open offer. TENDER AS A DEFINITE OFFER : If a tender has been submitted for goods or services in specified quantities it is termed as a definite offer, A binding contract comes into existence as soon as the tender is accepted. Lx Explains:  A invites tenders for the supply of 100 tons of local X, Y and Z submit the tenders. A accepts Y’s tender. There is binding contract between A and Y. TENDER AS A STANDING OFFER: Standing offer or tender may be of the nature of a continuing offer. Thus, a tender to supply goods as and when required over a certain period amounts to a standing offer. Here, the tenderer must supply whenever an order is placed. But he cannot insist on any order being made at all.  (a) A tendered to supply goods up to a certain amount to B over a certain period. B’s order did not come up to the amount expected and A sued for breach of contract. Held, each order made was a separate contract and A was bound to execute the orders made. B was under no obligation to make any order at all # Percival Ltd. V.L.C.C. (1918). (b)   A railway company invited tenders for the supply of certain iron articles over a period of 12 months. W’s tender was accepted. After supplying for sometime, W refused to execute on order placed during the currency of the tender. Held, W could not refuse within the terms of the tender # Great Northern Railway V. Witam CROSS OFFERS AND COUNTER OFFER CONCEPT | Identical offers made by two parties in ignorance of each others offer, are termed as cross offers. They will not constitute acceptance of one’s offer by the other # Tinn V. Hoffman 1873. EXAMPLE |  A writes a letter to B offering him his bike for Rs 100. At the same time B writes a letter to making a similar offer to buy his bike for Rs 100. Offers of both A and B cross each other. Such offers do not constitute to acceptance of one's offer by the other. Counter Offer: On the other hand, in counter offer there is a rejection of the original offer and a new offer is made that needs acceptance by the original promisor before a contract can be made. EXAMPLE |  X offers Y his bike for Rs 100. Y rejects the offer and offers A to buy his bike for Rs 80. Such an offer is known as the counter offer. CASE LAW | Hyde vs. Wrench (1840. 3 Beav. 334) FACTS |. In this case the defendant offered  to sell his estate or £1000 on June 6th on June 8, the Plaintiff made a reply offering to purchase it for £950, it was refused by defendant on June 27. On June 29, the plaintiff wrote that he prepared to pay £1000. The defendant refused. HELD | Court held  that the plaintiff’s letter expressing his willingness to purchase for £950. It was not an acceptance; it was a counter-offer which terminated the original offer.

Ingredientspedia

Ingredientspedia - Mischief under IPC

FOR LATEST UPSC LAW OPTIONAL MAINS COURSES CLICK BELOW  2021 COMPREHENSIVE COURSE : https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/20... 2020 COMPREHENSIVE COURSE : https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/la... 2020 TEST SERIES : https://www.lawxpertsmv.com/25...

CURRENT AFFAIRS FOR KERALA JUDICIAL SERVICE

KERALA JUDICIAL SERVICE SUPER SERIES – an initiative of Lawxpertsmv India Aim : Periodically previous year Kerala Judicial Service questions will be analyzed to benefit the aspirants. KERALA JUDICIAL SERVICE EXAMINATION (PRELIMINARY ) – 2017 ( HELD IN 2018 ) QUESTION 1 – What are the materials on which the court can depend, for its decision under Order VII Rule 11 CPC ? A) Pleadings of plaintiff B) Pleadings of plaintiff and defendant C) Pleadings of both sides and all materials produced by both sides D) None of the above ANSWER LINE | Learn with Lawxpertsmv Inida Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, discusses Rejection of Plaint - whenever a plaint is filed in any civil court for any claim/compensation to be recovered from the opposite party it can be rejected by fulfilling the following conditions mentioned below. GIST OF LEGAL PROVISION | ORDER VII RULE 11 | For more emphasis ref : Lawxpertsmv Kerala Judicial Servies Modules. The plaint shall be rejected in the following cases:— (a) where it does not disclose a cause of action; (b) where the relief claimed is undervalued or time given by court to correct but failed to do the same (c) where the plaint is insufficiently stamped or time given by court to correct but failed to do the same. (d) where the suit appears be barred by any law ANSWER | OPTION A – The criterion mentioned in (a) to (b) could be studied only from pleadings of plaintiff , therefore pleadings of plaintiff must be relied to take decision under ORDER VII rule 11 CPC. Note – documents along with plaint can also be relied upon RECENT UPDATE ON ORDER VII RULE 11 – SC judgement dated 9th July 2020 - DAHIBEN v. ARVINDBHAI KALYANJI BHANUSALI HELD | The provision of Order VII Rule 11 is mandatory in nature - Order VII Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure regarding 'Rejection of Plaint' is mandatory in nature. Rationale given by court | The underlying object of Order VII Rule 11 (a) is that if in a suit, no cause of action is disclosed, or the suit is barred by limitation under Rule 11 (d), the Court would not permit the plaintiff to unnecessarily protract the proceedings in the suit. In such a case, it would be necessary to put an end to the sham litigation, so that further judicial time is not wasted. Lx Explains ! Learn with us ! Order VII rule 11 is mandatory in nature means – this provision is compulsory – we know Order 7 rule 11 (Briefly explained above ) gives on which grounds a plaint could be rejected thus if any of the grounds arise then it is compulsory on part of the court to reject the plaint, because allowing such a plaint would result in unnecessary protraction of suit. FOR MORE DETAILS REFER LX JUDICIAL SERVICE MODULES - CLICK HERE KERALA JUDICIAL SERVICE COURSE CONTACT US | Lx E-mail : lawxpertsmv@gmail.com  Phone/Whats app : 6382125862 Website : www.lawxpertsmv.com